The intent of §4.5.3 is that the organization put in place procedures for 1) identifying actual and potential nonconformities to EMS requirements, 2) taking appropriate corrective or preventive action, and 3) reviewing the effectiveness of corrective or preventive actions taken.The nonconformity requirement of ISO 14001:1996 was a passive requirement in that it was only triggered when a nonconformity came to the attention of the organization through one of the other EMS procedures, such as the EMS audit or management review. ISO 14001:2004, however, requires that the organization establish and maintain procedures to identify actual or potential nonconformities, determine their causes, take action to avoid recurrence or occurrence, record results, and review effectiveness of corrective or preventive actions.
How the organization goes about identifying actual or potential nonconformities is up to it to determine. From the standpoint of registration auditors, it would seem that they would want to see a specific procedure requiring members of the organization to conduct some kind of periodic checklist driven, walk-through inspection for nonconformities. In addition, the procedure should allow for submission of nonconformities by any member of the organization. Actual nonconformities are usually fairly evident and relatively easy to investigate because there is a tangible occurrence with which to deal. The organization should also want to evaluate minor instances of nonconformity that, while not significant in and of themselves, if they occurred under different circumstances, could lead to a significant deviation from the EMS. Such “near misses” could be identified by the occurrence of a sudden, unexpected event, a failure to achieve an objective or target, or a deviation from the Environmental Policy.Potential nonconformities are more difficult to identify and correct. Here, application of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis would be appropriate for organizations having that capability.
When investigating nonconformities, organizations should focus on identifying underlying root causes, not just the immediate manifestation of the problem. If a chemical storage drum leaks, the organization should take action, first, to mitigate the damage and, then, to determine why the leak occurred; e.g., improper or negligent handling, mechanical failure, or lack of a leak detection system. Corrective or preventive actions should then focus on eliminating the cause through training, communication of procedures, use of leak-resistant drums, or installation of a leak detection system.
Other ISO 14001 sections, principally Emergency Preparedness and Response, Internal Audit, and Management Review, are tools that the organization implements in order to help identify instances of actual or potential nonconformity. The underlying principle of these sections is that the identification of nonconformities should be made by the organization through diligent application of these tools, not from the occurrence of an environmental event, a customer or community complaint, or investigation by a regulatory authority. While §4.5.3 does not specifically mention disciplinary action, in many cases disciplinary action or the threat of disciplinary action is appropriate to prevention of future nonconformities. Many organizations have written codes of conduct that give employees notice that deviations from the codes will not be tolerated and that prescribed penalties can result for infractions. These codes can be expanded to include penalties for deviations from the EMS. If so, penalties should be commensurate with the violation itself and should acknowledge the nature of the environmental damage, the degree of negligence, prior conduct, and the forthrightness of the employee being disciplined. Any such code and its remedies should be administered fairly and consistently and should have as its objective correction and prevention of EMS nonconformities, not punishment of employees.Finally, identification, investigation, and correction of nonconformities leads to the need to revise documented procedures.
Friday, October 9, 2009
Evaluation Of Compliance Of ISO 14001 EMS
The requirement to establish a procedure for periodically evaluating compliance with applicable legal and other requirements falls short of specifically requiring regulatory compliance audits but, in fact, a system of regular regulatory compliance audits may be the most practical means for meeting this requirement of the standard. In the U.S., determination of whether to conduct a compliance audit will be governed in part by the particular jurisdiction’s approach to allowing a legal privilege for the self-assessment audit.
Evaluation vs. Audit – The difference between an evaluation and audit can only be determined by looking outside of ISO 14001. Consulting a dictionary reveals that an evaluation involves a determination of value or worth and that an audit is an examination of accounts done by persons appointed for the purpose. A better definition `is the more specific ISO 19011:2002, Guidelines for Quality and/or Environmental Management Systems Auditing, which defines an audit as a “systematic, independent, and documented process for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which the audit criteria are fulfilled.” Many organizations do not have a system for evaluating regulatory compliance other than their own records and the inspections of regulatory officials. This lack of a verification system can be a risky way to operate. Reports of enforcement actions and consent agreements show that many organizations are blindsided by rogue employees who violate rules and falsify documents to cover up environmental misdeeds. Although ISO 14001 does not prescribe a specific approach to evaluation of regulatory compliance, organizations should consider methods for going beyond verification of records by collecting and evaluating physical evidence.
Evaluation vs. Audit – The difference between an evaluation and audit can only be determined by looking outside of ISO 14001. Consulting a dictionary reveals that an evaluation involves a determination of value or worth and that an audit is an examination of accounts done by persons appointed for the purpose. A better definition `is the more specific ISO 19011:2002, Guidelines for Quality and/or Environmental Management Systems Auditing, which defines an audit as a “systematic, independent, and documented process for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which the audit criteria are fulfilled.” Many organizations do not have a system for evaluating regulatory compliance other than their own records and the inspections of regulatory officials. This lack of a verification system can be a risky way to operate. Reports of enforcement actions and consent agreements show that many organizations are blindsided by rogue employees who violate rules and falsify documents to cover up environmental misdeeds. Although ISO 14001 does not prescribe a specific approach to evaluation of regulatory compliance, organizations should consider methods for going beyond verification of records by collecting and evaluating physical evidence.
ISO 9001 – Compatibility with other management systems
ISO 9001 – Compatibility with other management systems
ISO 9001 and ISO 9004 are quality management system standards which have been designed to complement each other, but can also be used independently.ISO 9001 specifies requirements for a quality management system that can be used for internal application by organizations, for certification, or for contractual purposes. It focuses on the effectiveness of the qualitymanagement system in meeting customer requirements.ISO 9004 gives guidance on a wider range of objectives of a quality management system than does ISO 9001, particularly for the continual improvement of an organizations overall performance and efficiency, as well as its effectiveness. ISO 9004 is recommended as a guide for organizations whose top management wishes to move beyond the requirements of ISO 9001, in pursuit of continual improvement of performance. However, it is not intended for certification or for contractual purposes.
During the development of this International Standard, due consideration was given to the provisions of ISO 14001:2004 to enhance the compatibility of the two standards for the benefit of the user community.This International Standard does not include requirements specific to other management systems, such as those particular to environmental management, occupational health and safety management, financialmanagement or risk management. However, this International Standard enables an organization to align or integrate its own quality management system with related management system requirements. It is possible foran organization to adapt its existing management system(s) in order to establish a quality management system that complies with the requirements of this International Standard.
ISO 9001 and ISO 9004 are quality management system standards which have been designed to complement each other, but can also be used independently.ISO 9001 specifies requirements for a quality management system that can be used for internal application by organizations, for certification, or for contractual purposes. It focuses on the effectiveness of the qualitymanagement system in meeting customer requirements.ISO 9004 gives guidance on a wider range of objectives of a quality management system than does ISO 9001, particularly for the continual improvement of an organizations overall performance and efficiency, as well as its effectiveness. ISO 9004 is recommended as a guide for organizations whose top management wishes to move beyond the requirements of ISO 9001, in pursuit of continual improvement of performance. However, it is not intended for certification or for contractual purposes.
During the development of this International Standard, due consideration was given to the provisions of ISO 14001:2004 to enhance the compatibility of the two standards for the benefit of the user community.This International Standard does not include requirements specific to other management systems, such as those particular to environmental management, occupational health and safety management, financialmanagement or risk management. However, this International Standard enables an organization to align or integrate its own quality management system with related management system requirements. It is possible foran organization to adapt its existing management system(s) in order to establish a quality management system that complies with the requirements of this International Standard.
Certification In ISO 9001 Standards
Certification In ISO 9001 Standards
Certification involves an independent assessment of your quality system to confirm that it meets the requirements of ISO 9001. You will need to design, document and implement your own quality system. The system will need to cover all the requirements of the ISO 9001 standard. Many certification bodies will not conduct a formal assessment until the system has been operating for at least three months. Your quality system cannot be audited until you have generated documentary evidence to show that you are meeting the standard. To find a certification body with relevant experience in your sector and accreditation from the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS). Certification by a non-UKAS accredited body is likely to lead to credibility problems with your customers. Arrange a visit from the certification body’s auditors. UKAS prohibits auditors from acting as consultants. They will not tell you how to meet the standard but can offer advice. They will seek objective evidence that you are complying with each of the clauses of the ISO 9001 standard. The auditors will tell you of any shortcomings in your system. If you satisfy the standard, the auditors put your name forward for certification. You will be required to correct these problems within a specified timeframe. You can also be certificated if the auditors only identify a small number of ‘minor’ problems. Once you are certificated, you can display the certification body’s logo, and if the body is UKAS-accredited, the UKAS ‘tick and crown’ symbol (consult UKAS about exceptions to this rule). If the auditors identify more serious ‘major’ problems, you will be required to correct these before certification. These surveillance visits normally take place twice a year at agreed dates. All certification bodies are required to revisit registered companies to ensure they still meet the requirements of the standard. You will be given time to deal with any minor or major problems which are identified before any action is taken to withdraw your certificate.
Certification involves an independent assessment of your quality system to confirm that it meets the requirements of ISO 9001. You will need to design, document and implement your own quality system. The system will need to cover all the requirements of the ISO 9001 standard. Many certification bodies will not conduct a formal assessment until the system has been operating for at least three months. Your quality system cannot be audited until you have generated documentary evidence to show that you are meeting the standard. To find a certification body with relevant experience in your sector and accreditation from the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS). Certification by a non-UKAS accredited body is likely to lead to credibility problems with your customers. Arrange a visit from the certification body’s auditors. UKAS prohibits auditors from acting as consultants. They will not tell you how to meet the standard but can offer advice. They will seek objective evidence that you are complying with each of the clauses of the ISO 9001 standard. The auditors will tell you of any shortcomings in your system. If you satisfy the standard, the auditors put your name forward for certification. You will be required to correct these problems within a specified timeframe. You can also be certificated if the auditors only identify a small number of ‘minor’ problems. Once you are certificated, you can display the certification body’s logo, and if the body is UKAS-accredited, the UKAS ‘tick and crown’ symbol (consult UKAS about exceptions to this rule). If the auditors identify more serious ‘major’ problems, you will be required to correct these before certification. These surveillance visits normally take place twice a year at agreed dates. All certification bodies are required to revisit registered companies to ensure they still meet the requirements of the standard. You will be given time to deal with any minor or major problems which are identified before any action is taken to withdraw your certificate.
Costs and resources Of ISO 9001 Standards
Costs and resources Of ISO 9001 Standards
The largest cost of ISO 9001 is the involvement of company
employees. The ‘ownership’ created by involving employees in designing the quality system maximises the chances of them accepting it. Reducing this cost by minimising employee involvement is a false economy. The next largest cost will be for designing and developing the system. This needs to be led by someone with experience in this particular field. You may have someone within your own organisation who has carried out this role, perhaps with a former employer. Your Business Link may offer free or subsidised advice and training, and will be able to provide names of approved consultants. Grants for work in this area tend to be directed through Business Links. Different areas have different grants, which depend on local conditions. A typical grant may cover up to 50 per cent of the cost of an approved consultant. Certification fees are around £800 for the smallest companies. Overall costs depend upon company size and the number of locations involved. Ask certification bodies for quotes for initial audits and surveillance visits. Many will give an all-inclusive price, including surveillance visits for three years. Typically, special rates will depend on how long the assessment is likely to take and what the company’s turnover is. Ask your certification body if it offers special rates for small companies. The standard requires that companies have trained internal auditors to conduct audits on the system. An internal audit can provide an effective means of monitoring the system and identifying areas for improvement. For further details, contact the International Register of Certificated Auditors.
The largest cost of ISO 9001 is the involvement of company
employees. The ‘ownership’ created by involving employees in designing the quality system maximises the chances of them accepting it. Reducing this cost by minimising employee involvement is a false economy. The next largest cost will be for designing and developing the system. This needs to be led by someone with experience in this particular field. You may have someone within your own organisation who has carried out this role, perhaps with a former employer. Your Business Link may offer free or subsidised advice and training, and will be able to provide names of approved consultants. Grants for work in this area tend to be directed through Business Links. Different areas have different grants, which depend on local conditions. A typical grant may cover up to 50 per cent of the cost of an approved consultant. Certification fees are around £800 for the smallest companies. Overall costs depend upon company size and the number of locations involved. Ask certification bodies for quotes for initial audits and surveillance visits. Many will give an all-inclusive price, including surveillance visits for three years. Typically, special rates will depend on how long the assessment is likely to take and what the company’s turnover is. Ask your certification body if it offers special rates for small companies. The standard requires that companies have trained internal auditors to conduct audits on the system. An internal audit can provide an effective means of monitoring the system and identifying areas for improvement. For further details, contact the International Register of Certificated Auditors.
ISO 9000 family of standards and SMEs
ISO 9000 family of standards and SMEs
The ISO 9000 quality management system is generic in nature and applicable to all companies, regardless of the type and size of the business, including small and medium enterprises (SMEs), and they are applicable to all categories of products, whether hardware, software, processed materials or services. ISO 9001:2008 specifies what is required to be done by an organization but does not indicate how it should be done, thus giving the enterprise a lot of flexibility to run its business.
It is simple to use, clear in language and easily understandable. The new standard is also appropriate for small companies, as it does not demand the type of paper bureaucracy needed for the implementation of the 1994 version. Only six documented procedures are now required and need for other procedures/documents can be decided by the company. Companies will, however, be required to provide objective evidence that the QMS has been effectively implemented. A small company may find it appropriate to include the description of its entire QMS within a single Quality Manual, including all the documented procedures required by the standard.
The process-based approach given in the new standard will tend to ensure that systems are documented and implemented in a manner that suits a SME’s own way of doing business. This approach makes it easier for SMEs to implement, instead of just taking over an artificial structure of QMS imposed from outside. It will also be easier for SMEs managed by their owners to demonstrate “top management commitment” towards QMS. Furthermore, in a SME, it is easier to ensure effective internal communication, better utilization of resources, people clearly understanding their roles and responsibilities, etc.
The new standard has included a provision for deciding on the applicability of
certain product realization processes included in section 7 of the standard. For example, if the SME has no responsibility for the design and development of the product it provides, the SME may say so, giving the reasoning behind it, in the Quality Manual; the certification body, being satisfied that this corresponds, would then award it certification to ISO 9001:2008. Similarly, other product realization processes such as purchasing, product identification and traceability, control of measuring devices may also be excluded if these are not applicable for the type of products or services being provided by the company.
It is also possible that SMEs may not have adequate in-house expertise or there may be other constraints to perform all processes on their own. In such cases, the new standard also permits the outsourcing of any of the QMS processes, providing the company has control over such processes. The nature of this control will depend on the nature of the outsourced or subcontracted processes and the risk involved. For example, the design and development process may be subcontracted to an expert or a specialized agency, inspection/verification of goods purchased may be subcontracted to an inspection agency, internal audit of QMS can be outsourced, etc. However, overall responsibility for ensuring control on all outsourced processes as per requirements of the standard would remain with the company’s management.
The ISO 9000 quality management system is generic in nature and applicable to all companies, regardless of the type and size of the business, including small and medium enterprises (SMEs), and they are applicable to all categories of products, whether hardware, software, processed materials or services. ISO 9001:2008 specifies what is required to be done by an organization but does not indicate how it should be done, thus giving the enterprise a lot of flexibility to run its business.
It is simple to use, clear in language and easily understandable. The new standard is also appropriate for small companies, as it does not demand the type of paper bureaucracy needed for the implementation of the 1994 version. Only six documented procedures are now required and need for other procedures/documents can be decided by the company. Companies will, however, be required to provide objective evidence that the QMS has been effectively implemented. A small company may find it appropriate to include the description of its entire QMS within a single Quality Manual, including all the documented procedures required by the standard.
The process-based approach given in the new standard will tend to ensure that systems are documented and implemented in a manner that suits a SME’s own way of doing business. This approach makes it easier for SMEs to implement, instead of just taking over an artificial structure of QMS imposed from outside. It will also be easier for SMEs managed by their owners to demonstrate “top management commitment” towards QMS. Furthermore, in a SME, it is easier to ensure effective internal communication, better utilization of resources, people clearly understanding their roles and responsibilities, etc.
The new standard has included a provision for deciding on the applicability of
certain product realization processes included in section 7 of the standard. For example, if the SME has no responsibility for the design and development of the product it provides, the SME may say so, giving the reasoning behind it, in the Quality Manual; the certification body, being satisfied that this corresponds, would then award it certification to ISO 9001:2008. Similarly, other product realization processes such as purchasing, product identification and traceability, control of measuring devices may also be excluded if these are not applicable for the type of products or services being provided by the company.
It is also possible that SMEs may not have adequate in-house expertise or there may be other constraints to perform all processes on their own. In such cases, the new standard also permits the outsourcing of any of the QMS processes, providing the company has control over such processes. The nature of this control will depend on the nature of the outsourced or subcontracted processes and the risk involved. For example, the design and development process may be subcontracted to an expert or a specialized agency, inspection/verification of goods purchased may be subcontracted to an inspection agency, internal audit of QMS can be outsourced, etc. However, overall responsibility for ensuring control on all outsourced processes as per requirements of the standard would remain with the company’s management.
Management Principles Of ISO 9001 Standards
Management Principles Of ISO 9001 Standards
ISO 9000 is based on eight management principles:
• Customer focus, resulting in meeting customer requirements and striving to exceed them;
• Leadership, aiming to create an internal environment in which people are fully involved;
• Involvement of people who are the essence of an organization;
• Process approach, resulting in improved efficiency to obtain desired results;
• System approach to management, leading to improved effectiveness and efficiency through identification, understanding and management of interrelated processes;
• Continual improvement, which becomes a permanent objective of the organization;
• Factual approach to decision-making, based on the analysis of data and information; and
• Mutually beneficial supplier relationships, based on an understanding of their interdependence.
ISO 9000 encourages the adoption of the process approach to manage an organization. There are five main areas considered for the revised process model in ISO 9000:
• Quality management system
• Management responsibility
• Resource management
• Product realization
• Measurement, analysis and improvement.
ISO 9000 is based on eight management principles:
• Customer focus, resulting in meeting customer requirements and striving to exceed them;
• Leadership, aiming to create an internal environment in which people are fully involved;
• Involvement of people who are the essence of an organization;
• Process approach, resulting in improved efficiency to obtain desired results;
• System approach to management, leading to improved effectiveness and efficiency through identification, understanding and management of interrelated processes;
• Continual improvement, which becomes a permanent objective of the organization;
• Factual approach to decision-making, based on the analysis of data and information; and
• Mutually beneficial supplier relationships, based on an understanding of their interdependence.
ISO 9000 encourages the adoption of the process approach to manage an organization. There are five main areas considered for the revised process model in ISO 9000:
• Quality management system
• Management responsibility
• Resource management
• Product realization
• Measurement, analysis and improvement.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)